AKIBAT HUKUM TINDAKAN KURETASE ABORTUS DILAKUKAN DOKTER UMUM TERHADAP PASIEN DI RUMAH SAKIT TIPE D BERDASARKAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP KEADILAN KESEHATAN

The regulation of abortion curettage must be carried out by an Obstetrician and
Gynecologist, but not all type D hospitals have Obstetricians and Gynecology so
general practitioners must take initial action with Perform actions even though they
do not have authority. This research aims to find out the legal consequences that may
arise from the act of curettage carried out by a general practitioner to patients in
Type D Hospitals based on the Principle of Justice. This study uses a normative
research method with legislative approach sourced from primary legal materials and
secondary to regulations related to abortion curettage. The results of this study
indicate that there is a legal vacuum that specifically regulates the curettage, and
also the inconsistency of regulations with the reality on the ground. Curettage can
only be performed by an obstetrician and gynecologist; however, the reality in the
field, especially in the type D General Hospital, is very small percentage of the
possibility of obstetrics and gynaecology specialists so that In an emergency, often
the general practitioner has to take action. By him it is It is important to distribute
the number of obstetrics and gynaecology specialists in all types of hospitals and the
formulation of stricter regulations related to curettage in order to In the future, no
general practitioner will take advantage of this legal loophole.
Keywords: Abortion, Curettage, Legal Accountability, Principles of Justice,